"They have offered no evidence that consumers who use Apple's iBooks software to download ebooks have come to believe that Apple has also entered the publishing business and is the publisher of all of the downloaded books, despite the fact that each book bears the imprint of its actual publisher," Cote wrote. While neither Black Tower Press nor its predecessor obtained a trademark for the line of books, Cote noted in her decision Wednesday that Apple did, first purchasing its use from a software maker to describe its line of computers in 1999 and then for the e-reader platform in 2010.
A search of the U.S, Patent and Trademark Office reveals an "ibook" record for science fiction books was filed in 1999 but listed as abandoned as of 2003, Another USTPO search reveals an Apple filing for "iBook" in 2010 that describes "software for reading electronic publications on digital electronic devices."Preiss, an author big terrazzo iphone case and publisher who specialized in graphic novels and science fiction, died in a car crash in July 2005, Barbara Marcus, then the executive vice president of the publishing company Scholastic, told The New York Times in 2005 that Preiss was among the first publishers to release electronic books..
(Via GigaOm). Small publisher claimed it had acquired the trademark before Apple began using it to describe its e-reader platform. A federal judge in New York has dismissed a trademark lawsuit against Apple over its use of the term "iBooks."Black Tower Press sued Apple in 2011, claiming that Apple's use of the term to describe its e-reader platform violated a trademark the small New York-based publisher acquired in 2006 and 2007. The publisher of science fiction and fantasy titles asserted that it acquired the trademark along with various assets of Byron Preiss, who had published more than 1,000 books under the "ibooks" brand starting in 1999.
So why has the Nexus 7 (deftly built by Asus) found so much success where other Android tablets seemingly haven't? (Remember the $400 7-inch Springboard? Neither do most.) Short answer: it's nearly a perfect combination of power, design, and features at a relatively low price, and as such is the first tablet to really get the whole high-quality/low-price tablet thing right, The long answer is a bit more complicated than that, so let's dive right in, The Nexus 7 houses the Tegra 3 system-on-chip, which includes a quad-core CPU and a 12-core big terrazzo iphone case GPU, That's enough horsepower to smoothly run the latest Android games while rendering 1,024,000 pixels (1,280x800 resolution), It's a fast chip by tablet standards, but even at the tablet's launch, it wasn't the fastest, Also, while apps load fast, they don't load superfast, Just fast enough that it doesn't test the patience of most users..
So while it may not win any benchmark contests, it also won't leave you staring impatiently at your screen for long periods of time, twiddling your thumbs while you wait for a large app to load. Lesson learned: The Nexus 7 was never the most powerful tablet -- the third-generation iPad had it beat at launch, as did the Transformer Prime -- but it didn't have to be. It simply utilized high-quality components (in this case: a pretty powerful CPU/GPU combo, fast RAM, and an optimized OS), resulting in apps that opened quickly, games that ran smoothly, and Web pages that downloaded with all due haste. If a tablet can manage that, most users will walk away with a positive impression and will likely tell their friends when the time comes.