If the simplicity factor for Google Glass is that it saves me from taking my smartphone out of my pocket, then that's not enough to outweigh the fact that it actually adds another device that I have to carry and forces me to wear glasses. I'll admit that a big part of what makes Google Glass difficult for people like me and the ones who are most likely to read this article is that most of our technology time involves work. And there aren't many examples I can think of where Google Glass would help someone get more work done.
I'm not saying Google Glass is completely useless, I can think of a number of pulp fiction poster iphone case specialized uses where Glass could offer an improved experience, However, it's important to remember that those are all specialized activities where Google Glass could provide an improved viewing experience in relatively short bursts, In other words, it's not something you wear all the time, That's a lot different than being an indispensable new product that changes how you live and work in the way that the smartphone and the point-and-click PC have..
Google Glass does not offer one of those life-changing promises. Without that, we can't expect it to be the next big thing. At best, right now it looks like it's going to be an expensive smartphone accessory. This story originally posted as "The one big factor Google Glass is missing" on ZDNet. commentary Before we call Google Glass the next big revolution in tech, remember that it cannot answer one essential question. Google Glass has generated plenty of interest and excitement. But before we crown it an industry revolutionizer, let's not forget that Google Glass still doesn't have a clear response to the one big question that all revolutionary products must answer.
Softbank has been using TD-LTE for quite some time, and as Son points out, it's doing so in Japan "on a large scale."TD (Time Division)-LTE presents one main advantage over the traditional, Frequency-Division Duplexing (FDD) technology it competes with: flexibility, With TD-LTE, a single spectrum block is used and carriers can decide how frequencies can be used within it, Similar to home pulp fiction poster iphone case broadband, TD-LTE allows carriers to dedicate little frequency to simple things, like sending e-mails, and more to bandwidth-intensive tasks like downloading applications or large files, The result is a more efficient system than what's currently available in the U.S..
Clearwire, the company that Sprint is trying to acquire, uses the TD-LTE spectrum. In his remarks to reporters on Tuesday, Son said that his company's expertise, coupled with the Clearwire buy, should dramatically improve Sprint's LTE efforts and give it a superior offering in the U.S. market. In other words, Softbank would be a better partner. Son's comments come just a few days after he said that Dish Network's unsolicited bid to acquire Sprint for $25.5 billion is "ridiculous."(Via The Verge).