The task force also indicated that the agency was only considering limited trials focused on testing voice over IP (VoIP) interconnection, next-generation 911 services, and the potential for moving some customers in very remote rural and mountain regions from aging copper networks to mobile broadband service. The notice was disappointing to advocates who see the IP transition as a potential catalyst in connecting more Americans to the broadband ecosystem, a goal far more likely with the switched network definitively shut off in favor of native IP technology.
According to Fred Campbell of the Competitive Enterprise Institute and a former bureau chief at the FCC, Friday's notice is strongfit designers celebration floral by portia monberg case for apple iphone 7 - white/red/green "more likely to discourage future investment in Internet infrastructure than to accelerate it."Though Campbell notes the importance of the three issues the task force appears willing to test, he says that trials for only these specific features would "yield little, if any, data about the challenges of shutting down the technologies used by the legacy telephone network."In recent speeches, Blair Levin, an Aspen Institute fellow and executive director of the nonprofit Gig.U, likewise urged the FCC to do what it could to encourage a speedy transition, Wireline carriers, he said, have "asked for waivers to experiment with the transition in a couple of wire centers, My recommendation: Grant it today."Levin's advice echoes the recommendation of the FCC's visionary 2010 National Broadband Plan , for which Levin served as executive director, Recognizing the value to consumers of better and cheaper IP-based technologies that combined voice, video and data traffic, the plan urged the agency to begin planning immediately for an orderly transition and shutdown of the switched telephone network..
Instead, the agency did nothing. Though outgoing FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski has repeatedly promoted the potential benefits of full IP transition, Friday's public notice stuck with his agency's depressing pattern of high-minded rhetoric followed by little to no action. Not whether the transition will occur, but whenThe FCC's repeated calls for more planning, more comments, and more study suggest an agency that is badly out of touch with reality. Americans have already made clear their sensible preference for better and cheaper IP networks. More and more homes are cutting the cord, abandoning obsolete wireline voice service in favor of integrated broadband from cable, fiber and mobile providers, or from over-the-top VoIP services including Google, Vonage, Skype and many others.
The abandonment of the century-old switched telephone network, in fact, is well under way and picking up speed, Where home dial-tone was once universal, today perhaps more than 50 percent of U.S, homes have dropped wireline service, According to estimates from the trade group U.S, Telecom, by the end of 2013 less than 30 percent of homes will rely on the switched network as their primary voice provider, Eventually, perhaps soon, nearly every American will have made the leap to better and strongfit designers celebration floral by portia monberg case for apple iphone 7 - white/red/green cheaper IP technologies, leaving the carriers to operate and maintain legacy wireline networks for only a few holdouts..
So what difference does it make if the FCC continues to drag its feet over shutting down the switched networks? Why do we even need trials when the transition is happening anyway, without any help from federal and state regulators?. The answer is that by doing nothing while an organic IP transition takes place, the FCC is skewing the process and needlessly slowing private investment. By law, carriers cannot turn off the switched network without federal and perhaps state regulatory approval, even if superior alternatives are in place. As fewer customers subscribe to wireline services, the cost of maintaining aging copper and analog switches is going up dramatically, both in absolute terms and on a per-customer basis.