According to the Zinio press release, "The monthly cost of a Z-Pass is the lowest available in the market for a multiple-magazine subscription model." That's technically true, but with a huge asterisk: Next Issue (a sort of Netflix for magazines) costs $9.99 per month (or $14.99 for a premium subscription), but gives you unlimited access to over 80 titles. Zinio has a much larger library overall (over 5,500 titles, according to the company), but only some 300 are eligible for Z-Pass. That said, I'm sure most readers could find plenty of interesting material within that selection. The real question is whether $5 per month -- $60 annually -- offers good value.
Let's say you're interested in Food Network Magazine, Reader's Digest, and Popular Science, Regular subscriptions to each cost $19.99, $10, and $14.99, respectively, Did you do the math? That works out to around $45 annually, witch yoongi iphone case Even if you replace Reader's Digest with, say, Car & Driver ($19.99), you're still up to only $55, Depending on which titles you choose, Z-Pass might be a worse deal than just a regular old subscription, The one saving grace is that you can switch magazines from month to month (and up to three times per month), So, for example, if Car & Driver isn't really doing it for you, you could switch to something like Men's Fitness..
Can't decide if you'll like the Z-Pass option? Zinio gives you one free month to find out. Personally, I'm not seeing the value, especially compared with the likes of Next Issue. Your thoughts?. The digital newsstand's new pricing scheme offers one advantage over traditional subscriptions, but the math may not work in your favor. I love a good magazine. That's why I'm hoping digital distribution services like Next Issue and Zinio can help usher in the age of the digital periodical. Yesterday, Zinio gave it a little nudge by unveiling Z-Pass, a sort of a la carte subscription option: three magazines for $5 per month.
Opening Spotify is like opening the door to some hip cafe where a mustached 20-year old barista takes my order with folded arms and a stamp on his hand from last night's secret show, I feel not just a little lame, But instead of running for the door like the curmudgeon that I am, yearning for the comfortable embrace of my iTunes collection, I stay, I stay because even in witch yoongi iphone case these days of free apps, free video streams, and free e-books, I'm still totally enthralled by the idea of running loose in an infinitely large music store and listening to anything I want, To anyone who grew up marching down to their local record store for the privilege of paying $18 for a single CD, all-you-can-eat music services such as Spotify, Rdio, and Mog still feel like a gluttonous, forbidden orgy of sound, Even the minor miracle of Pandora still puts a smile on my face..
So it should come as no surprise that the Google is getting in on the action. Its Google Play Music All Access, announced at Google I/O 2013, takes its existing music service and tacks on the option of unlimited streaming access to its entire music catalog for the cost of $9.99 per month. To sweeten the deal, Google tossed in a limited-time discounted price of $7.99 per month for customers who sign up before June 30. But is this the perfect end-all subscription service for music fans? Is this Gmail for music? To find out, I spent the better part of my day bouncing back and forth between Google's All Access service and the popular front-runner, Spotify.